Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua’s advocacy for the “one man, one vote, one shilling” formula for resource allocation has sparked criticism from various quarters, with EALA Member of Parliament Hassan Omar being the latest to voice opposition.
During an event in Nyali, Omar expressed concern that Gachagua’s campaign could exacerbate division among Kenyans.
He argued that implementing such a formula would leave certain regions feeling marginalized, as they have historically been underserved by past governments.
Omar emphasized the importance of upholding the constitution, which aims to provide equality for underdeveloped communities.
He reminded Gachagua of the social justice principles enshrined in the constitution, urging him to consider the plight of communities that have long suffered from neglect.
Omar called for broader consultation with elected leaders across the country before any significant policy pronouncements are made.
He stressed the need for inclusivity in decision-making processes, particularly on issues as sensitive as resource allocation.
Gachagua’s advocacy for the “one man, one vote, one shilling” model, initially proposed in the Building Bridges Initiative (BBI), has reignited debate surrounding equitable resource distribution.
While Gachagua argues that the formula is straightforward and would benefit heavily populated areas like Mt. Kenya, critics like Omar caution against its implementation without considering its potential repercussions.
As the discourse continues, it remains to be seen how policymakers will navigate the complexities of resource allocation in a diverse and politically charged environment.
The divergent views expressed by leaders like Gachagua and Omar underscore the importance of balanced and inclusive decision-making processes in shaping Kenya’s future.
Add Comment