President William Ruto fired a warning shot to politicians promoting politics of ethnicity and division on Saturday, declaring that the country will never return to its dark past.
Ruto emphasized the importance of national unity and condemned those who seek to exploit tribal affiliations for political gain.However, President Ruto’s statements have drawn criticism from some quarters.
Among the critics is Hon. Reuben Kigame, a former presidential aspirant, who pointed out a contradiction between Ruto’s rhetoric and his actions. Kigame accused Ruto of hypocrisy, noting that the president’s appointments in government have predominantly favored two communities. “Anybody can talk about national unity and an end to tribalism.
Ruto gives the major appointments in government to two communities, and then lectures us on ending tribalism! The president is simply reacting to Limuru 3. Actions are a stronger language than words. We need a government where people lead by example,” Kigame remarked.
Kigame’s comments refer to the Limuru 3 conference, a significant political event where the discussion of national unity and inclusive governance was central.
His assertion is that the president’s actions have not matched his public pronouncements, thereby undermining the call for an end to tribal politics.
In response to Kigame’s criticism, some of Ruto’s supporters defended the president’s record and questioned Kigame’s motives.
One response highlighted Kigame’s long-standing advocacy for peace and unity, suggesting that his current stance is inconsistent with his previous principles.”Reuben Kigame must know that the path he chose is dirty and messy. He has preached peace, love, and unity for many years. He has made many united, and they still follow him.
On this road, he needs to go back home where he truly excels and doesn’t struggle,” a Ruto supporter stated.
This exchange underscores the complex and often contentious nature of Kenyan politics, where issues of ethnicity and national unity are deeply intertwined.
President Ruto’s challenge lies not only in addressing these issues but also in ensuring that his actions are perceived as aligning with his rhetoric.
For many Kenyans, the hope is for a government that genuinely reflects the diverse makeup of the nation and promotes unity through equitable representation and inclusive policies.
As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how President Ruto will navigate these criticisms and whether his administration will take concrete steps to address the concerns raised by figures like Kigame.
The broader question is whether Kenya can move beyond its historical divisions and build a future grounded in true national unity and shared prosperity.
Add Comment