A new Bill has been introduced in Parliament that could change how the national audit office operates. The proposed law seeks to remove the Auditor-General as the head of the audit office and instead give more control to the Audit Advisory Board.
This move could affect the independence of the Auditor-General, who is responsible for overseeing how public funds are used and ensuring transparency in government spending. The Bill is sponsored by National Assembly Majority Leader Kimani Ichung’wah, a key figure in President William Ruto’s administration.
If passed, the Bill will shift power from the Auditor-General to the Audit Advisory Board, which will have authority over crucial aspects such as budgets, human resources, and other key decisions.

This means the Auditor-General will no longer have full control over how the audit office functions. Critics argue that this could weaken the office’s ability to conduct independent investigations and expose corruption in government institutions.
The Auditor-General plays a vital role in ensuring public funds are not misused, and any move to reduce their powers raises concerns about accountability.
Supporters of the Bill claim that the proposed changes are necessary to improve efficiency and oversight within the audit office. They argue that giving more powers to the Audit Advisory Board will create a more structured system of decision-making.
However, opponents believe this is a calculated move to interfere with the independence of the Auditor-General.
In the past, audit reports have exposed major financial scandals involving government agencies, and some see this Bill as an attempt to control the audit process and prevent such revelations in the future.

Many experts and civil society groups have already raised alarm over the Bill, warning that it could lead to more corruption and mismanagement of public resources.
They argue that the Auditor-General’s independence is crucial in holding government officials accountable. Weakening this independence could create an environment where financial irregularities go unchecked.
The Auditor-General’s office has previously uncovered irregularities in government spending, and reducing its authority could make it harder to investigate cases of corruption. The timing of this Bill also raises questions, as it comes when there have been growing concerns over transparency in government spending.
The current administration has faced criticism over increased borrowing and questionable expenditures. Some analysts believe that limiting the Auditor-General’s powers could be a strategy to avoid scrutiny of government financial activities.
If the Bill is passed, it could make it harder for Kenyans to know how their taxes are being spent. The push to amend the audit office structure is likely to spark intense debate both in Parliament and among the public.
Some lawmakers have already voiced their opposition, arguing that the Auditor-General must remain independent to safeguard public funds. Others, especially those allied with the government, are expected to support the changes.
The final decision will depend on how Members of Parliament vote, but the implications of this Bill could be far-reaching. At a time when the country is struggling with economic challenges, ensuring transparency in government spending should be a priority.
Weakening the office responsible for auditing public funds could send the wrong message and make it easier for financial mismanagement to continue.
Kenyans will be watching closely to see whether Parliament prioritizes accountability or if this Bill will pass despite the concerns being raised.
Add Comment