NCBA Bank is facing serious allegations of privacy violations that could expose the institution to major legal and financial risks.
Following the recent, Thomas Macharia Mwangi vs Absa Bank PLC (E065/2023) case, which highlighted a major privacy violations by Absa Bank, similar concerns are emerging about NCBA’s treatment of its employees.
While the Mwangi’s case directly involves Absa Bank, it serves as a broader warning for all financial institutions, particularly NCBA, which is rumored to be engaging in questionable employee surveillance practices.
The court case against Absa Bank centered around the bank’s decision to hire a private investigator to dig into the private life of Thomas Macharia Mwangi, a suspended branch manager.
The investigator monitored Mr. Mwangi in public places and gathered information on his personal life, including his behavior in social settings and interactions with various individuals.
The court ruled that this conduct violated Mr. Mwangi’s constitutional right to privacy under Article 31, which protects individuals from arbitrary invasions of their personal lives.
As a result, Absa Bank was ordered to pay a compensation.
The court awarded Mr. Mwangi Kes 5 million in general damages, along with Kes 2.3 million in unpaid bonuses for 2022, Kes 647,218 in notice pay, and Kes 373,294 for unpaid salary increments.
The ruling sent a strong message to employers privacy breaches in the name of workplace investigations are not only unethical but can also be financially costly.
NCBA Bank, though not yet formally implicated in a public court case, has come under increasing scrutiny due to reports of similar practices.
Employees and whistleblowers have accused NCBA of hiring private investigators to monitor their personal lives, a violation that could result in substantial legal challenges for the bank.
Such surveillance tactics, if proven true, could hinder the actions of Absa Bank and expose NCBA to lawsuits, compensation claims, and regulatory sanctions.
The Mwangi vs Absa case proves a growing trend among some employers to overstep their bounds when investigating employee misconduct.
While employers have the right to conduct investigations, those inquiries should focus on professional behavior and workplace performance, not personal life.
The court in the Absa case emphasized that Mr. Mwangi’s privacy was unjustly invaded, and the bank’s failure to disclose the findings or allow him to address them was a violation of fair labor practices.
If NCBA is indeed engaging in these invasive practices, it could face consequences similar to those experienced by Absa.
The precedent set in the Mwangi case could open the door for affected employees at NCBA to take legal action for any privacy violations they have suffered.
This would not only lead to financial payouts but also damage the bank’s reputation as a fair and ethical employer.
The financial sector is heavily regulated, and banks like NCBA must tread carefully when handling employee-related matters.
The Kenyan Employment Act and Constitution protect workers’ rights, including their privacy.
NCBA’s alleged behavior, if true, could be a violation of these laws, exposing the bank to legal battles and potential penalties.
NCBA Bank should take heed of the lessons from the Mwangi vs Absa case.
Invasions of employee privacy are not only illegal but also detrimental to the trust between employees and employers.
If NCBA does not address these allegations and adjust its internal practices, it may find itself embroiled in a legal situation with dire consequences for both its financial health and corporate reputation.
Add Comment