CS Public Service Moses Kuria has emphasized on the need for public servants to be employed on a contract basis.
He argued that this approach not only addresses the challenge of the wage bill but also ensures the country receives proper output from its employees.
Drawing parallels between his position and that of the President, Kuria questioned why anyone well-meaning would fear being employed on a contract basis if both he and the President are subject to similar terms.
This comparison suggests that contract employment is a fair and reasonable practice that should be embraced rather than feared.
The issue of the wage bill has long been a concern for many governments around the world, including Kenya.
By transitioning public servants to contract employment, Kuria believes the government can better manage its finances while still ensuring that employees are fairly compensated for their work.
Kuria’s emphasis on proper output highlights the importance of accountability and efficiency within the public service.
Contract employment can incentivize employees to perform at their best, knowing that their continued employment depends on their ability to meet expectations and deliver results.
However, while Kuria’s proposal may offer potential benefits, it also raises questions and concerns.
Critics may argue that contract employment could lead to job insecurity and a lack of stability for workers.
There may be challenges in implementing such a system, including determining the appropriate length and terms of contracts, as well as addressing potential loopholes or abuses.
Ultimately, the debate over contract employment in the public service is likely to continue, with stakeholders weighing the potential advantages and disadvantages of this approach.
As discussions progress, it will be important for policymakers to consider the perspectives of all parties involved and to carefully evaluate the potential impacts on both employees and the broader public sector.
Add Comment