Nairobi car dealer Joseph Kairu Wambui, better known as Khalif Kairo, and his firm Kai & Karo Limited have been ordered by the High Court to refund Sh3.4 million to a buyer after failing to deliver a 2017 Audi Q7.
The order turns an arbitral award into an enforceable court decree. The buyer, Fawn Wood Crest Limited, had agreed in October 2024 to purchase the vehicle, which was priced at about Sh5.8 million.
The company paid a deposit of Sh2.2 million in cash. It later added another Sh1.7 million raised from the sale of a Subaru Outback, bringing the total paid to roughly Sh3.9 million.
The Audi never arrived. Of the money collected, only Sh500,000 was returned, leaving Sh3.4 million outstanding.
When the funds were not refunded, the dispute went to arbitration rather than a full trial.
The arbitrator ruled in favour of the buyer and awarded Sh3.4 million. Under Kenya’s Arbitration Act, an arbitral award is binding but not automatically enforceable.
The winning party must apply to the High Court for the award to be recognised and adopted as a court decree.
Once that happens, the award carries the full force of a judgment and can be executed through the usual processes, including attachment of assets if necessary.
That is what occurred here. The High Court adopted the award and directed Kairo and Kai & Karo Limited to pay the Sh3.4 million, together with commercial interest and costs.
The court did not reopen the underlying facts or second-guess the arbitrator’s findings. Its role was limited to confirming the award and making it enforceable.
The case adds to a series of commercial disputes that have trailed Kairo’s car dealership operations.
In 2025, two separate fraud charges involving a combined Sh5.9 million were withdrawn after he refunded the complainants and the cases were discontinued by mutual agreement. Those earlier matters also centred on payments received for vehicles that were not delivered.
Kairo has maintained that he runs a legitimate business, has sold hundreds of cars over the years, and that the problems arose from operational difficulties rather than deliberate intent to defraud.
The latest court order is narrower and purely civil. It does not involve criminal charges. It simply requires Kairo and his company to return the unpaid balance on a deal that collapsed.
For the buyer, the ruling provides a clear path to recovery after more than two years of waiting. For Kairo, it represents another formal finding that money received for a vehicle must be repaid when the vehicle is not supplied.
Execution of the decree will now depend on compliance or further enforcement steps.
Commercial interest will continue to accrue until the full amount is settled.
The decision underscores the practical value of arbitration clauses in vehicle sale agreements and the High Court’s role in converting private awards into public judgments that can be enforced.
Add Comment