Recent controversies involving Caleb Kositany and former Transport Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen have centered around a controversial airport deal involving the Indian conglomerate Adani.
Allegations have surfaced that bribes were paid to certain high-ranking officials, including Kositany and Murkomen, to push through a deal related to the Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA).
Kositany, who chairs the Kenya Airports Authority (KAA), has been at the center of the debate after the KAA received a proposal from Adani Airport Holdings to lease JKIA.
The partnership aimed to finance critical infrastructure upgrades at the airport, including a new passenger terminal and runway.
However, due to Kenya’s strained fiscal situation, the deal stirred significant controversy, with many questioning the transparency of the process.
Legal and regulatory evaluations were promised by KAA, but civil organizations and some politicians raised concerns about whether due diligence had been followed, triggering protests and inquiries.
On the other hand, Murkomen, who has been accused of past involvement in other financial scandals, also came under fire.
Allegations regarding his connections to questionable financial dealings were raised, although no direct link has yet been established in this case, but we’ll keep you on the know as any new development emerges regarding this.
However, his involvement when he was Transport CS and his role in overseeing infrastructure projects related to the Adani deal have further deepened suspicions.
This deal has faced immense public backlash, with accusations of backdoor dealings and financial kickbacks creating political tension.
Public interest watchdogs, including the Law Society of Kenya, have demanded more transparency from the government regarding the terms of the lease deal with Adani, which they fear may place a critical national asset under foreign control without sufficient oversight.
While concrete evidence of bribes to push the Adani deal has yet to emerge publicly, the association of figures like Kositany and Murkomen with questionable financial conduct in the past has fueled suspicions.
The government’s handling of the matter is likely to remain a focal point of scrutiny as investigations and legal processes continue.
Add Comment