Home » Critics question Augustus Muli’s motives amid political controversies
Editor's Picks Governance

Critics question Augustus Muli’s motives amid political controversies

Augustus Kyalo Muli, leader of the National Liberal Party (NLP), has found himself in the spotlight for all the wrong reasons.

Known for his inflammatory accusations against the Wiper Party and its leader Kalonzo Musyoka, Muli has alleged that Kalonzo is blocking the reconstitution of the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) to serve his 2027 presidential ambitions.

However, a closer look at Muli’s actions and affiliations suggests he may be a proxy for President Ruto, often referred to as “Kaongo” for his long list of broken promises and lies to Kenyans.

The label “Kaongo,” now a familiar term for Ruto, symbolizes his failure to deliver on his grandiose campaign pledges.

Blogger and activist Nelson Amenya, has taken to his X handle to highlight Muli’s alleged role as “Kaongo’s proxy.”

In one of his posts, Amenya criticized Muli for being a mere mouthpiece of the regime, describing him as a tool used to shift blame and create unnecessary political diversions.

According to Amenya, Muli’s focus on attacking the Wiper Party is a deliberate attempt to distract Kenyans from Ruto’s failures, particularly in ensuring a fair and transparent IEBC reconstitution.

Amenya’s sentiments have struck a chord with many Kenyans who feel betrayed by the very leadership they once trusted.

He pointed out that Muli’s actions are not driven by a genuine desire to reform electoral systems but rather by a need to protect Ruto’s interests at all costs.

This perception has only been reinforced by Muli’s ongoing attacks on political figures like Koki Muli Grignon, who recently clarified that it was Augustus Muli who initiated legal action against her, contrary to his claims.

Amenya’s posts have highlighted this hypocrisy, calling out Muli for his dishonesty and questioning his integrity.

Critics, including Amenya, argue that Muli’s conduct reflects the broader rot within Ruto’s administration.

By aligning himself with “Kaongo,” Muli has positioned himself as an enabler of a government that thrives on broken promises and political theatrics.

Amenya has not minced his words, describing Muli as a political puppet whose sole purpose is to shield Ruto from accountability while deflecting attention to opposition parties.

As the debate rages on, Amenya has continued to use his platform to expose the failures of both Ruto and his proxies like Muli.

Amenya’s relentless focus on this issue serves as a reminder that Kenyans must remain vigilant and hold leaders accountable for their actions.

In the end, the question lingers, is Augustus Muli genuinely interested in safeguarding democracy, or is he merely advancing the agenda of president William Ruto.