The appointment of Eng. Kung’u Ndung’u as the Director-General of the Kenya National Highways Authority (KeNHA) has stirred concerns about his suitability for the role, casting a shadow over both the recruitment process and his credentials.
It is now under intense investigation whether he possesses the necessary qualifications to lead such a critical institution, as questions arise over his compliance with professional standards required for a position of this magnitude.
Ndung’u’s academic background includes an Executive MBA from Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology and a Bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Nairobi.
While these qualifications might seem adequate on the surface, critics have highlighted glaring gaps.
The Executive MBA, for instance, is not a technical postgraduate degree in engineering, making it insufficient for meeting the threshold of technical expertise expected in senior engineering leadership.
Moreover, his alleged lack of registration with the Engineers Board of Kenya (EBK), an essential requirement for professional engineering practice in Kenya, further complicates his position.
These shortcomings, not only weaken his professional profile but also raise serious concerns about the integrity of the recruitment process.
Despite defenders like former Transport Cabinet Secretary James Macharia touting his extensive experience within KeNHA and his involvement in projects such as the Dongo Kundu Bypass and Nairobi Expressway, such endorsements do little to address the core issue.
Experience alone cannot substitute for formal qualifications and regulatory compliance, especially in a field as sensitive and technically demanding as infrastructure development.
The perception that his appointment may have bypassed critical scrutiny undermines public trust in the processes governing such high-level placements.
The broader implications of this controversy extend beyond Ndung’u himself.
It casts doubt on the transparency and meritocracy of public appointments, suggesting that political patronage or internal favoritism may have played a role in his selection.
This perception not only tarnishes KeNHA’s reputation but also erodes confidence in its ability to oversee multi-billion shilling projects with the required level of professionalism and accountability.
A petition challenging Ndung’u’s qualifications adds a legal dimension to the scandal, potentially exposing KeNHA to reputational damage and operational disruptions.
The fact that such a critical appointment could proceed without comprehensive vetting raises the specter of systemic flaws within public sector recruitment.
If left unaddressed, these issues risk creating a precedent where merit and compliance with professional standards are sidelined in favor of expedience or political considerations.
The controversy surrounding Ndung’u’s appointment exposes a deeper rot within the country’s governance structures.
It reflects poorly on the individuals and institutions involved in the recruitment process, who appear to have prioritized convenience over competence.
KeNHA, an institution entrusted with the development and maintenance of Kenya’s road network, cannot afford to have its credibility eroded by questionable leadership appointments.
The situation calls for a thorough investigation to uncover the truth and enforce accountability, both for the sake of the agency’s integrity and the public interest.
Add Comment