The financial world has been rocked by a recent letter from the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) to the Capital Markets Authority (CMA), highlighting irregular bond trades involving the National Social Security Fund (NSSF).
This letter, authored by CBK’s Director of Financial Markets, David Luusa, has raised serious concerns regarding transparency and potential corruption within Kenya’s bond market.
Between May and July this year, NSSF engaged in several suspicious transactions that caught the attention of the CBK.
According to the analysis, NSSF was buying bonds at inflated prices, only to sell them at lower rates shortly after.
NSSF then repurchased the same bonds at even higher prices.
This unusual trading pattern has left financial experts in limbo, with many questioning the motives behind such actions.
CBK has labeled these trades as “illegal” and demanded a comprehensive investigation.
Key players involved in these trades include Humphrey Wachira Gichuru and Pargamon Investment Bank, a relatively new player in the stockbroking and investment banking scene.
Their involvement, coupled with the erratic trading activity, has raised eyebrows.
CBK has urged the CMA to scrutinize these transactions and submit a detailed report of their findings.
One of the primary concerns is whether these trades were directly managed by NSSF or if they were orchestrated by asset managers on its behalf.
The larger fear is that insiders at NSSF may have been colluding with brokers to manipulate the bond market for personal gain, with NSSF shouldering the financial losses.
This case exposes deeper issues within Kenya’s bond market, particularly concerning transparency.
The lack of clear and accurate market data coupled with trade reporting delays makes it difficult to determine the true value of bonds.
Furthermore, many treasury departments within banks create their own yield curves, leading to inconsistencies and making it even harder to get a clear picture of bond prices.
The situation also raises questions about the effectiveness of Kenya’s regulatory frameworks.
The East Africa Bond Exchange (EABX), which was established to bring transparency to the bond market, is still not fully operational due to connectivity issues with the Central Bank.
Despite being licensed by the CMA, the EABX’s inability to function efficiently casts doubt on the Central Bank’s commitment to transparency and market integrity.
This scandal could have far-reaching consequences for the NSSF, the bond market, and Kenya’s financial sector at large.
It underscores the urgent need for reforms to prevent such occurrences in the future and restore confidence in the country’s financial institutions.
Kenyans and market players alike will be watching closely for the outcomes.
Add Comment